Tokyo
Fudosan Soba | Kita Ward area analysis

Kita Ward real estate market and area profile

Explore rental and sale prices in Kita Ward through town-level prices, living conditions, real estate activity, and demographics. Compare geographic price differences with the local characteristics behind them.

Based on its places data, Kita Ward is characterised by plenty of cafes and a residential character.

Rental market
120-140k yen
Rent / m²
4-4.5k yen
Sale market
50-60M yen
Sale price / m²
900k-1M yen

Town-level market map of Kita Ward

This static map uses real town boundaries and aggregated values. Switch metrics to compare prices and area characteristics across the ward.

Rent/m² | Lighter colors are lower and darker colors are higher
Rent map by town in Kita WardA map of towns in Kita Ward, colored by rent, sale price, and area score.

Rental and sale prices by layout

Total prices and prices per square meter vary by layout within the same ward. Treat categories with fewer observations as broader estimates.

LayoutRentRent/m²Sale priceSale/m²
1R60-80k yen4-4.5k yen15-20M yen800-900k yen
1K80-100k yen3.6-4k yen20-30M yen900k-1M yen
1DK120-140k yen4.5-5k yen20-30M yen1-1.1M yen
1LDK160-180k yen4-4.5k yen40-50M yen900k-1M yen
2DK140-160k yen3.3-3.6k yen30-40M yen700-800k yen
2LDK200-250k yen4-4.5k yen50-60M yen900k-1M yen
3LDK250-300k yen4-4.5k yen50-60M yen800-900k yen
4LDK300-350k yen3.3-3.6k yen80-90M yen700-800k yen

Real estate market and living environment

This view separates local conditions into market liquidity, place activity, business diversity, and the foundations of daily life. Scores are relative rankings across all 23 special wards, not absolute ratings.

Rental

Rental market structure

49/100
Rank 21 of the 23 special wards
Place momentum25
Real estate strength38
Business diversity83
Livability base60
Market risk53
Data confidence70
Price trend-0.0%
Closed/new0.9
Turnover7.8
Days listed0 days
Discount rate2.9%
Stagnant share4.2%

Sale

Sale market structure

54/100
Rank 12 of the 23 special wards
Place momentum25
Real estate strength51
Business diversity83
Livability base60
Market risk32
Data confidence70
Price trend+0.1%
Closed/new0.94
Turnover2.56
Days listed13 days
Discount rate16.3%
Stagnant share17.6%

Demographics and local businesses

Population density17,256/km²
Foreign resident share5.7%
Average household size1.87 people
Senior population share24.6%
Youth population share10.3%
Median age45.9 years

Ward-level aggregation from the 2020 census.

Izakaya
13%
Yakiniku
12%
Restaurants
7%
Offal yakiniku
5%
Meat restaurants
4%
Japanese restaurants
4%
Soba
3%
Curry
3%

Detailed category mix for tracked places. This is not a comprehensive industry census of every establishment.

What defines Kita Ward

The real places and environment that give the area its character, beyond prices and statistics.

Notable places in the area

Well-known venues drawn from real data, numbered to match the map.

#NameTypeRating
1Akabane Hachiman ShrineLandmark4.2
2Nanasha ShrineLandmark4.3
3Shibusawa Memorial MuseumLandmark4.1
4Hiratsuka ShrineLandmark4
Ukima ParkAsukayama ParkCentral ParkAkabane Nature Observation ParkFormer Furukawa GardensKita Athletic ParkNanushi-no-Taki ParkShimizuzaka ParkOji 5 chome Apartment Community ParkAkabane Sports-no-Mori ParkAkabane ParkInatsuke ParkTakinogawa ParkKamiyabori ParkToshima ParkHakusanbori ParkAsuka Ryokuchi ParkAkabanedai ParkOtonashi Water ParkHorifune Ryokuchi ParkTabatadai ParkShowamachi Children's PlaygroundChildren's PlaygroundHorifuna ParkToshima ParkToshima ParkHigashi Oji Community Park1. Akabane Hachiman Shrine12. Nanasha Shrine23. Shibusawa Memorial Museum34. Hiratsuka Shrine4
Notable places Parks

Parks and green space

About 3.1% of Kita Ward is parks and gardens (from OpenStreetMap park data), shown in green on the map above.

  • Ukima Park
  • Asukayama Park
  • Central Park
  • Akabane Nature Observation Park
  • Former Furukawa Gardens
  • Kita Athletic Park
  • Nanushi-no-Taki Park
  • Shimizuzaka Park

Rail access

The ward has around 19 rail stations, served by these lines.

  • JR Tohoku Line
  • Asukayama Park Monorail
  • Keihin-Tohoku Line
  • Saitama Rapid Railway Line
  • Yamanote Line
  • Shonan-Shinjuku Line
  • Akabane Line
  • Chiba Urban Monorail Line 1
  • Chiba Urban Monorail Line 2
  • Sobu Main Line
  • Toei Mita Line
  • Toden Arakawa Line
  • Tokyo Metro Namboku Line
  • Nippori-Toneri Liner

Town-level data for Kita Ward

Town medians may include estimates from nearby areas when observations are limited. Future town pages will be published only when observation and quality thresholds are met.

TownRent/m²Sale/m²Area scoreNearest station
Akabane 14,250 yen950,000 yen74Akabane-iwabuchi | 141 m
Kami jujo 13,800 yen750,000 yen70Jūjō | 467 m
Higashi-Jūjō 14,250 yen1,050,000 yen69Higashi-Jūjō | 328 m
Akabane minami 1
Nakazato 1
Naka jujo 1
Ōji-Honchō 1
Iwabuchimachi
Shimo 1
Ōji 1
Nishigahara 1
Higashi-Tabata 1
Kishimachi 1
Jujo Nakahara 1
Showamachi 1
Tabata 1
Tabata shimachi 1
Takinogawa 1
Sakaechō
Kamiya 1
Jujodai 1
Toshima 1
Horifune 1
Kaminakazato 1
Akabanedai 1
Akabane nishi 1
Nishigaoka 1
Akabane kita 1
Ukima 1
Kirigaoka 1

Deeper analysis for Kita Ward

The figures below are available in the analytics platform. This page shows the structure only.

Town-level scores in Kita Ward

TownDensityVarietyQualityReview volumeDaily lifeMomentumTransitGreen spaceResidentialPrice momentumEssentials
Akabane 1
Kami jujo 1
Higashi-Jūjō 1
Akabane minami 1
Nakazato 1
Naka jujo 1
Ōji-Honchō 1
Iwabuchimachi
Shimo 1
Ōji 1
Nishigahara 1
Higashi-Tabata 1
See it in the analytics platform

Compare a property with the local market

Ward and town medians are a starting point. Check a property's fair price using its layout, size, age, station distance, and other characteristics.

How to read this data

Published values are aggregated statistics from rental and sale listings. They are not closed transaction prices or formal property appraisals. Review median ranges, observation counts, and estimation status together. Area scores do not directly rate whether prices are high or low. They express the relative density, diversity, transport access, and daily convenience of an area.